Independent, transparent guidance to help plan sponsors select, monitor, and manage investment lineups that serve participant needs and fiduciary standards.
Our team provides retirement plan investment advice built on a clear, repeatable process, so decisions have a documented paper trail.
Implement an Investment Policy Statement (IPS)
Quarterly investment monitoring and fund changes per the IPS
Fee (k)ompression analysis and removal of revenue sharing to help ensure clients have the lowest-cost share classes and overall plan fees
Quarterly investment review using our 10-point scoring framework
Target-date fund analysis aligned with participant profiles and QDIA (Qualified Default Investment Alternative) needs
Concise committee updates with relevant market context; minutes documented and stored in the Fiduciary Briefcase
How We Work With Your Committee
Choose the role that fits your governance model. In a 3(21) arrangement, we present recommendations for committee approval; in a 3(38) arrangement, we implement changes and report back. Either way, every step is documented and stored in your fiduciary file.
Lower, transparent pricing benefits both the sponsor and participants. Clear documentation shows how decisions were made, which helps during audits and committee transitions.
Lock In a Fee Review Schedule
Let’s review your current pricing, identify quick wins, and set a schedule for ongoing benchmarking and negotiations.
The NAPA Top DC Advisor Teams list issued on March 18, 2025for the 2025yearhighlights retirement plan advisor firms that are in a single physical location, and have at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement.The list is based on self-reported assets under advisement as of December 3, 2024.433 teams were selected.No fee was paid for the nomination, receipt, or promotion of the award. Third-party ratings are no guarantee of future investment success and do not ensure that a client or prospective client will experience a higher level of performance or results. These ratings should not be construed as an endorsement of the advisor by any client nor are they representative of any one client’s evaluation.
NAPA Top Women of Excellence- MVP
NAPA Top Women of Excellence – MVP award issued by National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) on October 20, 2025 for the 2025 Year was awarded to non-producing (possibly) licensed relationship managers primarily focused on managing relationships and the retention of clients. The financial professional applied for the recognition. Criteria used to determine the winner(s) includes information provided on a series of quantitative and qualitative questions on their experience and practice, as well as accomplishments, contributions to the industry, state of workplace retirement plans and the ways in which they give back. Numerous people were considered for this honor and 110 were selected in the MVP category. No fee was paid for the nomination, receipt, or promotion of the award. Third-party ratings are no guarantee of future investment success and do not ensure that a client or prospective client will experience a higher level of performance or results. These ratings should not be construed as an endorsement of the advisor by any client nor are they representative of any one client’s evaluation.
PLANADVISER Top Retirement Plan Advisers
The PLANADVISER TopRetirement Plan Advisers listing issued on March 21, 2025for the 2025yearrecognizes the top retirement plan advisers in the industry based on quantitative measures. Criteria to be listed requires advisers to have a minimum requirement of 50 plan clients or retirement plan assets under advisement of $400 million or more.Numerous people were considered for this honor and 267 were selected. No fee was paid for the nomination, receipt, or promotion of the award. Third-party ratings are no guarantee of future investment success and do not ensure that a client or prospective client will experience a higher level of performance or results. These ratings should not be construed as an endorsement of the advisor by any client nor are they representative of any one client’s evaluation.